How the engagement is built
We start by reading the file — the operative pleadings, the contract or policy the case turns on, the scheduling order, and whatever discovery has already moved. Then we tell you what we think, including the parts you may not want to hear. A co-counsel who agrees with everything is worth exactly as much as a local counsel who reads nothing.
From there we divide the work explicitly, in writing, before anyone bills anything. Not "we'll handle local requirements" — an actual list of who owns which pleading, which motion, which witness, and which deadline. Ambiguity about division of labor is how co-counsel arrangements fail, and it always fails on the deadline nobody thought was theirs.
What we take on
Pro hac vice, handled properly
Minnesota admits visiting lawyers under Rule 5 of the General Rules of Practice. A lawyer who is and remains duly admitted in Minnesota must move the applicant's admission in the action, and that Minnesota lawyer accepts service of all papers and must be present before the court — in chambers, in the courtroom, or by permitted remote means. The motion is served on all parties and comes with an affidavit or declaration disclosing pro hac vice applications in the prior two years, plus the Board of Law Examiners' confirmation of good standing. Courts are directed to grant these motions liberally, and admission can be revoked for conduct violating the applicable rules.
One nuance worth planning around: the presence requirement is firm for the initial appearance, but on a subsequent appearance in the same action the court has discretion to let the out-of-state lawyer proceed without Minnesota counsel present. That discretion is far easier to obtain when the Minnesota lawyer has demonstrably been participating.
Note also that pro hac vice admission is required for any lawyer arguing before the courtor signing pleadings or other documents in the action. Signing a brief from out of state without admission is not a technicality here.
Fees
Division of a fee between lawyers who are not in the same firm is permitted in Minnesota only if the division is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer or each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the representation; the client agrees to the arrangement, including the share each lawyer will receive, confirmed in writing; and the total fee is reasonable.
We prefer the proportional-work basis, because it is the honest description of what we intend to do. Hourly and flat-fee structures are equally available where they fit the matter better. Whichever it is, it is agreed and papered before work starts, and the client agreement says exactly what each firm is responsible for.
Conflicts
We run a conflict check before any substantive discussion of your matter. Send the caption, the parties, and the affiliated entities — that is enough. If we are conflicted, you will hear so quickly, and we will point you toward firms that are not.
Every matter turns on its own facts, and no result in any prior case predicts or guarantees a result in another. Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney–client relationship.